this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
176 points (98.9% liked)

News

23397 readers
3467 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A bankruptcy judge is set to hear arguments Monday in conspiracy theorist Alex Jones ’ effort to stop the satirical news outlet The Onion from buying Infowars and turning it into a parody.

Jones alleges fraud and collusion marred the bankruptcy auction in which The Onion was named the winning bidder on Nov. 14 over a company affiliated with him.

It’s not clear how soon U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez in Houston will issue a ruling. He could allow The Onion to move forward with the sale, order a new auction or name the other bidder as the winner. At stake is whether Jones gets to stay at Infowars’ studio in Austin, Texas, under a new owner friendly to him, or whether he gets kicked out by The Onion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The consideration is to ensure that assets being sold toward the monetary judgement are not sold at an arbitrarily low value. He has the right to have the assets sold at a reasonable value to fulfill the monetary judgement.

Whether the consideration will go beyond that, is a different story. But that's the reason the system works this way.

If anything though, the court should be throwing the other bid out because it's affiliated with Jones. And I think that's what is going to happen honestly.

[–] HellsBelle 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

He has the right to have the assets sold at a reasonable value to fulfill the monetary judgement.

Not according to Legal Eagle. (thanks to justOnePersistentKbinPlease)

The court gave the trustee wide latitude in deciding how the auction ran, what the rules were and who would be chosen to 'win'.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AND on top of that. Alex Jonse's own shell company was outbid by the onion. So the onion's offering was a fair value. Because the onion was willing to pay more than Jones for Jones's own company.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

That's not quite accurate.

The onion's bid was technically lower overall, but they made an agreement with some of the victims of Jones' harassment that would make them better off overall.

Essentially one group is legally owed 97% of the proceeds of the sale while everyone else gets what's left. The agreement was that instead of a 97:3 split, the smaller group gets a bigger payout and the larger group gets a cut of future ad revenue.

Everybody wins in this arrangement, except Alex Jones. So everyone wins.