this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
16 points (80.8% liked)

Gaming

21206 readers
40 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Have anyone else noticed that UE 5 is significantly harder to run than other game engines in the current generation. Every game that uses UE 5 is hard to run and the visuals doesn't look worth the performance hit. Games from other engines and Games uses UE 4 is so much better.

Just take a look at S.T.A.L.K.E.R, yes they might be qble to optimise it more but even games less buggy if it's UE 5 it's hard to run. I play a LOT of AA games that uses UE 4 and all of them hits 100+ fps without breaking a sweat while still looking beautiful. It's crazy.

Why do you think this is? Also while you're commenting, drop the best performing 9th gen game you've played too!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tracker 1 points 3 months ago

UE5 sucks, if for anything else, the inability to handle Alt-space as a combination of keys that can be pressed at the same time. I’m not a WASD player (developed my own key arrangement way before it was the default - damn you Wolfenstein 3d and Descent). Alt is my move forward, and Space is jump… in every-single-UE game I cannot run and jump! Not without a keyboard macro to map alt as a different key. I am loving Stalker2 (as I still love every single previous stalker game) but keybinds suck, and some of them are hard coded and can’t be changed (like going up-down ladders is still WS)