Asklemmy

44123 readers

602 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

When I buy a physical book, am I entitled to scan for myself? (self.asklemmy)

submitted 1 month ago by niko to c/[email protected]

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I don't mean to distribute, but to scan for myself to read digitally, am I allowed to do that legally and ethically when I buy a physical book or would that be totally unethical and illegal?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I imagine it'd be the same as printing of a copy of the Mona Lisa and putting it up on your wall for your own viewing pleasure. Completely legal.

Where as printing it off and then charging other people to see it would be illegal.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The Mona Lisa is in the public domain, so no, that's not really a good analogy for a recently published book.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

For work in the public domain, that's one thing, but for work which is still copyright protected, you can actually be sued for (shockingly enough) making copies of it.

Generally, though, most countries only care if you distribute copies of something (even if you're not making money off of it), but that's not to say that the concept of "distributing" hasn't been stretched pretty thin in the past.

Rightsholders have gone after businesses and private individuals just for playing sports events on radio or TV audibly/visibly enough to have an "audience", thereby infringing on broadcast rights. Even if they're not charging a thing for it. Feel free to read this and see how far the insanity goes.

If I buy a book and make copies of the pages to takes notes on, that's usually fine. But if I make a copy and give it to a friend...