this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
300 points (88.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43940 readers
440 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If anyone can find more pixels for me i would appreciate it.

Thanks y'all.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

"y'all" fills a legitimately useful gap the English language has. Other languages have a word like this.

Edit: also something cool I just found out, some languages have a way to disinguish "we" (you and I), and "we" (me and the rest of us, not you). It's called clusivity and is missing from European languages. Many indigenous languages of the Americas and Oceania have this, as well as Vietnamese and northern dialects of Mandarin.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Not a gap in every dialect! "Ye" is another plural second person used in Ireland

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Hear y'all hear y'all, Reggie King from o'er the holler brought pawpaw moonshine for the weddin'

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

And youse in Dublin.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Every dialect has a word for it. There's no gap.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

The worst is when a language formally has a disambiguating word but then speakers all just decide to not use it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Any examples of an equivalent in other languages?

I speak a small amount of French but can't think of one

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Vous" is the first one that comes to mind in french. But since it is also a more formal (and/or "respectful") version of "tu/toi", it can both designate a group of people or a single person, depending on the context (just like "you" in English). Sometimes people will use "vous tous" (literally "you all") to make this clear.

It is a little better than the "you" situation in English since if you are speaking with someone that is not using the singular form of "vous" to speak about you (which is basically anyone you are familiar with unless they are your boss or In-laws and kind of oldschool), it is instantly clear what they mean at least.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

In Portuguese (especially Brazilian), there are singular and plural forms of "you": "você" (singular) and "vocês" (plural). In English, "you" behaves like a plural because it's followed by "are" instead of "is". The only exception I can see is "yourself" and "yourselves" that refer to both singular and plural forms.

However, In Portuguese, even though we have "vocês" as plural form, we also use "vocês todos" or "todos vocês" ("you all"/"all of you") sometimes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Spanish has "Ustedes" (except in Spain, they use "Vosotros/Vosotras")

[–] Grandwolf319 1 points 1 week ago

There is also “you lot”