this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
372 points (97.9% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2974 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Women “would have their uteruses removed when they turn over 30,” Naoki Hyakuta, leader of the Conservative Party of Japan, said in a stream on his YouTube channel on Friday.

On the channel, he also said that he would make it law for “women who are single after 25 years old not to be allowed to marry.”

(...)

Later, Hyakuta posted an apology on his X account. “I cannot deny that the expressions were too harsh,” he said. “I apologize for those who were offended.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] whyNotSquirrel 173 points 1 week ago (5 children)

WTF is happening in this world

[–] [email protected] 148 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I've been saying it since 2015, but it bears repeating!

The global conservative propaganda machine — lead by the US and Russia — is using all of the data obtained from surveillance capitalism to target, A/B test, and iterate on psychological warfare across social media in real-time (as close to as the platforms allow). The most criminally corrupt and sociopathic benefit the most, as there is no limit to how depraved they will go — bots, lies, disinformation, deep fakes, utilizing actual criminal enterprises and scam operations, illegally obtained data — they will do whatever it takes to succeed.

There really isn't much difference between persuading you to buy a product and persuading you to vote for a political party; they both attack similar weaknesses and vulnerabilities, and the process of building the data pipelines and statistical models is nearly identical. People who knew history were always saying that this is what surveillance capitalism would lead to eventually. I don't think any of us thought it would happen so quickly, but the lack of regulation and highly centralized nature of social media meant that a relatively small operation could access 90% of the Internet using population.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 week ago

Persuading you to vote for their guy, or if you’re disinclined to do so, persuading you to not vote by instilling disgust/outrage (see also: “Genocide Joe”) or just a blackpilled sense of powerlessness.

[–] xmunk 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Unchecked access to the internet by people who aren't emotionally mature enough to handle it.

Allowing all of humanity onto the internet when 30% of people still believe chocolate milk comes from brown cows was a mistake.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Allowing all of humanity onto the internet when 30% of people still believe chocolate milk comes from brown cows was a mistake.

You are referrering to children. Right? And I've lived a considerable amount of my life taking this as an urban legend. Not a fact.

[–] xmunk 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My apologies. I totally flipped some numbers. It's actually 7% of people (not children) surveyed believe that chocolate milk is from brown cows.

Now the survey wasn't too robust with 5000 total respondents but it's still embarrassing that that number isn't like "Seven American adults in total believe chocolate milk is from brown cows"

Here's a CNN fluff piece on it https://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/16/us/chocolate-milk-help-trnd/index.html

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

No need to apologize. At best, I have to do it, because you managed to make me laugh while at the same time lose a little bit of hope for humanity.

How can someone be that uninformed?!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Here’s a real number. 56% of Americans read at or below a sixth grade reading level.

When complex topics like the economy are discussed, _at least _ 56% can’t comprehend the concepts because they lack the vocabulary. They do not understand how government works, or their own bodies, or diplomacy, or historical contexts. They are not capable of being part of many important national conversations.

Now couple this with the fact that Democrats are terrible at messaging and simplifying complex policy into digestible sound bites while Republicans have perfected it, and you can easily see how we get to where we are now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

My sincere apologies upfront for my next sentence: I do not fathom what 6th grade reading level entails. Not in the USofA nor in my little barbarian european country.

What I am aware is that children's books and how they are taught to read is a diservice for them, with an overwhelming(ab)use of unnecessary images and infantilizing story telling.

This isn't an argument to have children read "War and Peace" as a bed time story but kids could dispense with all the garbage being thrown at them (including school text books) and most parents happily buy them and instead having something that actually challenges intelectually.

And using a dictionary doesn't hurt, unless you drop it on your toes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

In America they seem to prefer banning books that might cause some sort of empathy or critical thought.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

To be fair, chocolate milk comes from milk.

Milk comes from cows.

Most cows are at least partially brown, many 50% or more brown.

Conversly, albino cows constitute a small portion of the milk supply.

So it is, arguably, a correct statement.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Men are going off the deep end

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And many of us men are just as baffled by it. I honestly don’t understand why there are so many men – who I’m sure shutter at any mention of a woman’s period – that feel the need to control every aspect of reproduction and do so in the most cruel ways.

But also, the women who voted in support of those men are exponentially more baffling to me.

My brain hurts trying to understand it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Imagine being told every minute of every day that you don’t matter. That as a woman, your only purpose is to glorify men, support men, breed more men. That it’s the greatest and highest calling of women to surrender your life and your choices to men.

That women are stupid and sinners because of Eve’s actions, and will be forever. So you can never be allowed any kind of authority, because like Eve you’ll just do something foolish or abuse it.

Now imagine everyone and everything around you shows and supports this worldview. All the time.

That’s where it comes from. When something is all you’ve ever known, then it’s normal. And, even if you consciously don’t believe it, it still worms its way inside of you.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Russian state media just showed nudes of Trump's wife during prime time tv.

We're in a weird spot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

WTF is even happening in this article? An official / novelist says “women would have their uteruses removed” and there is no additional context? Is he describing a fictional future? What? Why is this presented as some kind of news? What’s this “would” phrasing? Would under what conditions?

Before we panic about the world let’s get some basic context to this drivel. How does sterilizing women over 30 address population decline, even in the most bizarre fictional speculations?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think that the idea is that by setting a strict deadline after which women can’t have children or marry, they are forced to start a family now or risk regretting it later. That’s the only way I can make sense of this bizarre scenario.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I guess maybe… It’s a ridiculously terrible notion no matter what your priorities are.