this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
376 points (98.0% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

7685 readers
518 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
TheDude
manifex
biela
imaqtpie
376
Feedback about our name: someone's concerns on sharing (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) by brbposting to c/main
111 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Shoutout to our hard-working maintainers, first of all.

Wanted to open a space for the community to discuss this aspect of marketing/identity.

Original comment link [e: snip]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brbposting 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This comment would be more relevant a year down the line if perspectives shifted and users begged for sanitization, but:

Is it technically challenging or financially costly or otherwise problematic to mirror content to another subdomain, or domain mask or something? I thought of this after seeing oldsh.itjust.works:


try.itjust.works

leg.itjust.works

share.itjust.works

subm.itjust.works

(2 & 4 don’t work as well as the current split word)

No reply requested unless it seems like it would be fun/interesting to type one

[–] InEnduringGrowStrong 2 points 2 hours ago

I'm not an expert on the specific of this, but changing the domain for the UI (as in oldsh.itjust.works) seems a lot easier than changing the domain for the backend, which includes federation with all other instances.
I don't know of any way to change the federated stuff without breaking pretty much everything and starting over.
Maybe there is and I just don't know about it, or maybe there could be an easier way at some point.