this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
1305 points (99.0% liked)

memes

10368 readers
2824 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1305
Been thinking this for over a decade (i.imgur.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
163 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ayyy -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

it’s never paid

As a salaried worker your pay will not change just because you took time off to vote. So it is de facto requires to pay for the time, but only for those who already have the privilege of a salaried position.

Edit to make my point even more clear: the current law is structural discrimination against poor people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You are arguing semantics on whether it’s paid or not. No one cares. The point is, paid or not, your job has to give you time to vote, usually at the employees expense.

[–] ayyy 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Thanks for your reply! I am not arguing semantics at all. I am pointing out an inherent disadvantage faced by lower paid workers in an unfair system. Which is the entire point of this discussion. The fact that you don’t care about a few hours of paid time perfectly demonstrates that the privileged benefactors of the current system don’t even realize that others are being actively oppressed through technicalities of the law.