this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
362 points (93.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27062 readers
2007 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The atmosphere is so heated, and the statements are getting more and more extreme. Let's just assume Harris wins the election. After a campaign like this, how could you ever have a normal relationship with your pro-Trump neighbor/father-in-law/Uncle/Barber or what ever again?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You don't. It wasn't really normal before 2016 and normal left the building since.

Since 2016, its been a constant onslaught of idiots that live on the internet creeping out into the real world with their bullshit and conspiracy theories and half of America taking them seriously

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I blame McCain. When he chose Palin to be his running mate in 08, he gave voice to the crazies on the right wing. It wasn't long after that that we saw the rise of the tea party, which led to maga.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I think it really started with the Clinton impeachment, Rush Limbaugh, Fox News, then we had the stolen 2000 election, then 9/11, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, "support our troops", anti Muslim rhetoric, then the rise of social media. All coincides with the brainwashed kids/boomers who came out of the heritage foundation. Obviously, the racism and conservatism was always in the background. You could even trace it back further to Regan/Nixon/McCarthy. Also, desegregation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You can trace it back as least as far as Barry Goldwater and the rise of right-wing "think-tanks" in the 1960s which came as a backlash to the civil rights movement and the perceived dominance of left-wing politics in government. Which led to Nixon's "Southern Strategy", right-wing talk radio, Fox News, and the ongoing brainwashing of much of rural America in particular.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah the tea party started around 2009, so that tracks. However, I'd say we had this current undercurrent of fascism since Reagan. I don't know if it was a little more chill in the few decades before him but we did also have FDR and internment camps, the Amerocan nazi parties live the German American Bund and others.

It's something that american society can't seem to shake nor doesn't want to

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

This attitude is part of why we have this problem today. These people didn't come from nowhere. They weren't just creeps on the internet. The percentage of the population that desires a trump presidency is far too significant. Half the country has been quietly wishing for a christo-fascist oligarchy since 2001. They've put in a lot of time and effort to make their dream come true. It's a shame nobody was really watching (even though the FBI has reports going back years about the infiltration of white supremacy groups into law enforcement), at least not close enough to make a difference in its growth.

The unfortunate truth is that this was allowed to happen. We dismissed their beliefs as crazy rantings instead of real threats to be addressed. If people more readily acknowledged the beliefs held by trumpets as real (a real threat) instead of internet insanity, we wouldn't be here. Instead, we shoved them away, crying wacko. Now the propaganda runs so deep in most, there is literally no turning them back. The rise of fascism in this country hasn't been taken seriously enough. And I don't think it ever will be, until it's far too late.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We dismissed

No, the Democratic Party and enlightened centrists dismissed the threat. There were people like me rallying against this bullshit since George W Bush stole the 2000 election. Some of us were able to hear these crazies clearly and realized what they wanted. We were told to shut up and stop overreacting.

Being able to say "I told you so" isn't much of a salve when you're starting down the barrel of a totalitarian regime, but don't paint us all as rubes. People were sounding the alarm, they were ignored.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

You are correct. I wish I had more to say than that. I wish I was cogniscient of these issues back then.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Whole i agree with most of your comment, I'm not really reading any solutions. I'd my attitude is the problem, what's the proper attitude to have to deal with these imbeciles?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The proper attitude is to treat their beliefs as real (to them) and not just conspiracy or insanity. To look at them as your brother or sister and ask yourself "how did they get this way?" and not just hand-wave away their beliefs as insanity. The proper attitude is to truly engage with those who aren't just acting in bad faith. How to differentiate that aspect, though, is getting harder to the point of impossibility. I fear we may have reached a tipping point where it becomes impossible to discern bad faith from deep propaganda brainwashing. I'm not sure if there is still a path forward in genuine conversation and understanding, which is the only route to breed empathy, something these people both lack within themselves and are deprived of from outside. I don't see it as their fault. I see it as a failing of the community at large, one that is more ready to shun the individual, because that's way easier than actually trying to genuinely engage them and help them grow as a person.

I believe the way out of fascism truly is love and compassion. My fear is that it's a cycle; the perceived distance of fascism makes our society more susceptible to being taken over by it, leading to a fascist society benefiting the few, leading to the grassroots recognition that we are one people and one humanity, leading to an uprooting of fascism and rise of empathy.

Sorry if this was a bit hard to follow, I haven't been sleeping well and I'm awake far too early.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah the differentiation is the trick.

How does one engage sometime who thinks that Harris is literally the antichrist?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I don't know and it distresses me, hence my fear of being past the turning point. Sometimes you can't even begin to engage without getting outright hostility in return, such as with your example.