this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
122 points (90.7% liked)

PCGaming

6429 readers
3 users here now

Rule 0: Be civil

Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy

Rule #2: No advertisements

Rule #3: No memes, PCMR language, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #4: No tech support or game help questions

Rule #5: No questions about building/buying computers, hardware, peripherals, furniture, etc.

Rule #6: No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.

Rule #7: No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts

Rule #8: No off-topic posts/comments

Rule #9: Use the original source, no editorialized titles, no duplicates

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Yes and no.

You can't blame the director of monetization for doing his job. You can blame the owner and the board of directors for going that route.

Those decision makers are what I mean when I call out the company, not the developer that's just doing what he's paid for.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You can monetize in ways that can't be summed up as "gambling"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You wouldn't need a monetization CEO then when the mission wasn't to implement sleazy and addicting tactics.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yes you can? I could probably find a job kicking homeless people, that wouldn't mean i wasn't an awful person for taking that job. I get doing bad things to make a bag when you're desperate, but that dude is no doubt a rich prick that could easily retire by now.