this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
223 points (98.7% liked)
Games
33081 readers
1292 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So in your mind the subsidiary has no autonomy? The publisher says "bloat" and the subsidiary says "how much"?
Want to explain how Fallen Order didn't become a bloated mess? Star Wars is one the most popular franchises in the world and it's EA we're talking about. If it's all on the publisher Fallen Order should've been a mess the same way Battlefront 2 was a mess.
Systemic problems don't vanish when one case goes well. Even Respawn had predictable troubles in their very next game. The kind that happen all the dang time, when the publisher literally owns your company, and can fire anyone in charge who doesn't run things the way they expect. If you don't say "how much?" you better keep your resume current.
The reward for bucking the trend and making something exceptional is being squeezed to make another and another and another. Sent to the Jedi mines.
Their budget is controlled from above. Their deadlines are controlled from above. They can negotiate, but it's a negotiation with their hands clasped and their knees on the floor. And as soon as they fumble the demanded product, for any reason, everybody might get fired.
I've had this argument too many times to care anymore. My point is that if there's an actual issue with budgeting the developers/publishers can focus the product and cut the bloat. We've now reached that point where there are actual problems with budgeting and an industry vet more or less said the same thing I've been saying, which is that AAA is trying to do too many things and they'd do better if they focused what they're doing.
You're not arguing what I've said. You're arguing over who to blame and if your want to put the blame solely on the publishers do that, I don't care who you blame.
'I don't care, I'm not arguing' is a bizarre lead-in to the same argument.
An actual example of not-arguing was my first reply to you: it was a yes-and that pointed to why "AAA" games keep ballooning. You then immediately blamed "leadership." You acknowledged the power dynamic, where those leaders kinda have to do whatever publishers want, or else there's no money, and then... blamed them anyway. Like the only options are zero autonomy versus entirely their fault.
Not, I dunno, systemic pressure that makes this shit keep happening, even when developers and industry vets plainly know it's bad for them. Almost like it's not what they'd choose... but it's not their choice.