this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
1218 points (97.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

5846 readers
2373 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spidermanchild 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The answer to what? If everyone does this, there won't be a single remote place on earth that isn't crawling with sprinter vans. It can't scale, and it doesn't need to be specifically catered to. You want the wilderness, you get the wilderness. You want low latency Internet, then get to a fiber connection. We don't need every first world amenity everywhere.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

nah. you can live in the city if that's what you like. i'll do what i like. do you really want to alienate non-urban liberals?

depopulation is a possible alternative to preventing swarms of sprinter vans too. you really don't want to put everyone in a city.

[–] spidermanchild 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not trying to alienate anyone, I'm trying to understand why low latency gaming needs for digital nomads is worth the real downsides of providing such a service (scientific, GHG, atmospheric tinkering, etc). I also believe that we should leave a lot more of the earth alone and that nature matters. I'm not trying to put people anywhere, just recognizing there are pros and cons to different living schemes, humans are social creatures, and population of 2 areas don't warrant large societal investments. I'm similarly against a hypothetical drone sushi delivery service for rural Canadadian boreal forests if that happens to have real downsides too.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

who said anything about gaming? what if you work remotely and can't afford rent? what if you feel unsafe around gatherings of people (including small towns)?

[–] spidermanchild 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The original post I responded to was someone talking about how starlink lets them game in a rural RV. What about carbon emissions from thousands of rocket launches? What about atmospheric damage? What about astronomy? I'm saying the downsides don't appear to be worth the upsides for these niche scenarios. Humanity survived just fine for quite some time before ultra remote Internet became a thing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

look, i hate it too. i don't want these things in my night sky either, but just give us anti-social, edge-of-civilization dwellers some respect and recognition. we're not trying to take any more than we need.