United States | News & Politics

7174 readers

1368 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

224

Former Ronald Reagan staffers endorse Kamala Harris for president (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

165 comments fedilink hide all child comments

More than a dozen former Ronald Reagan staff members have joined dozens of other Republican figures endorsing the Democratic nominee and vice-president, Kamala Harris, saying their support was “less about supporting the Democratic party and more about our resounding support for democracy”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I referenced credible sources (here’s another) substantiating the adoption of abducted Ukrainian children by Russian families.

You referenced your own opinion coupled with speculation, and attempted to discredit widely accepts facts from multinational sources.

Yeah. I’m the one who’s denying reality.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Kyive independent is not credable nor is it remotly objective, it is a mouth pice of the Ukranian government

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So again you use your opinion to discredit a source without providing any substantiated information.

Your opinions aren’t facts. Maybe you should provide a reputable source to support your opinions before calling challenging the credibility of others’ factual sources.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have provided the same level of evidence, that you have that it is credible or factual or not bias. You where the one that made the positive claim, as is typical rules you have the burdon of proof

second my evidence is ... BASIC meida litericy skills

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You haven’t provided one link to a source in this thread. I’m done with your time-wasting. Good night.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

you merely posted a link aserting that it was credible, I said that it was not, no one has presented a link over the credibility, my argument is that basic media litericy shows that this has severe biases and not truthful, you have provided nothing, we are still operating under asertions