this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
59 points (64.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7228 readers
214 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
59
Jill Stein surges ahead of Kamala Harris among Muslim-American voters in key swing states (www.middleeastmonitor.com)
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
109 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Green Party candidate Jill Stein is gaining ground among Muslim-American voters in three critical swing states: Michigan, Arizona, and Wisconsin, according to a recent poll by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

Stein leads Vice President and Democrat candidate Kamala Harris in these states, with 40 per cent support in Michigan, 35 per cent in Arizona, and 44 per cent in Wisconsin. This surge in popularity appears tied to Stein’s vocal criticism of US support for Israel during the ongoing genocide in Gaza.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

She has not promised to “keep sending Israel bombs”. She has said that she would continue to arm Israel

lol

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Site tagline material.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Copied from my other reply:

I’m sorry, but “saying that she’d continue to arm Israel”, which would literally be her job if Congress apportions funds for her to arm Israel, is not equivalent to “promising to give Israel bombs”. The keyword “promise”, to me, suggests she would do anything her power to aid Israel, even if she doesn’t have to. I’ll accept any constructive criticism of this take, but not a strawmanning that strips away the context that it’s literally the law to do what Congress says in this case.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

Here's the thing, taking your paraphrased quotes as accurate (and I believe they are) she is not appending any condition on arming Israel. She did not say "If Congress apportions funds, I will arm Israel," [let alone "If and only if,"] she said "I will continue to arm Israel," without any conditional, which Biden has demonstrated the President can do at least to some extent through unilateral executive authority in addition to Congress being able to do it. Therefore, the statements are equivalent. I therefore maintain that "lol/lmao" is a valid response to claiming they are different.