this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
41 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16836 readers
1003 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I trust other people playing the game way more than the people who make the game, sell the game, or get paid to review the game.

If everyone I know with similar tastes to mine says something sucks, there's a 99.9999999% chance I will independently think it sucks anyway; so I might as well listen to others who have played it and save myself some time and money.

[–] Trollception 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've actually been surprised but how many gems I've found in games with a 70% rating or a 82% rating. Sometimes ratings can be impacted by feelings about a company or a media incident when the actual game is rock solid.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say those numbers are for games that suck, anyway. That's a decent, just not mind-blowing game. Anything that's 40% or lower is what I would say almost universally sucks. But I would also take into account review bombing for things beyond the scope of the game itself, as it is very often reported on when it happens.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Open critic has a handy chart available for scored titles that compares it with the rest of their database. This offers some insight into the score distribution:

  • a score of 50 places in the 6th percentile
  • a score of 60 places in the 15th percentile
  • a score of 70 places in the 40th percentile
  • a score of 80 places in the 79th percentile
  • a score of 90 places in the 99th percentile

So a score of 70 is already pretty mid, and 60 or lower is going to be dire.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My favourite is when you have a friend, or known reviewer, going on about how something sucks, and you realise that it sounds right up your alley.

I specifically rented The One, because of Roger Ebert's 1 and 1/2 star review in the newspaper, trashing Jet Li's The One (just to totally date myself).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

That's why I went and saw Dude, Where's My Car in the theatre. Because Siskel and Ebert had given it their worst score ever and I thought if those chucklenuts hated it, it must be good.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah there are some absolute gems like Astral Chain which got positive reviews like 8/10 but in reality are close to 10/10 for me personally. One of the best games on the system.

Then there are a few infamous examples like Godhand and Deadly Premonition which were completely slated by many reviewers but I found to be very strong titles. 8/10 personally.