this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
1879 points (98.9% liked)

Mildly Interesting

16906 readers
441 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I assume "Other purposes" is govt kickbacks to mining and gas companies 😬

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can request this in most countries, especially here in Canada. It's cool that the Aussie government makes it more transparent and accessible though. The "other purposes" seems a bit sussy-baka, though.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There is no excuse for any country not to do this TBH. The math is really easy and uses already available information: take the year's total federal spending for different things, specifically in the form of percentages of the year's total tax revenue (hopefully the government has been keeping track of what they've been using the money for) and multiply by the total taxes paid by a specific person and you get exactly how much of their money went to what. This assumes every person's tax revenue is treated the same which I'm pretty sure is at least mostly the case in every country.

If they release the national spending percentages (which they should) then it'd be pretty easy for individuals to calculate these themselves.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Well there is a reason: they spend it on bullshit and they don't want tax payers to know

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

i’m assuming that “other purposes” are other categories that each are smaller than the ones listed. they are probably available on a website or something that gives the full list.

it would be nice if they had merged them together in wider but more informative categories though