this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
-2 points (47.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7186 readers
841 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/20133423

[interview with Dr. Hassan Abdel Salam, from Abandon Harris movement]

Ann Garrison, BAR Contributing Editor 04 Sep 2024

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Please see: everything I just said that contradicts overemphasizing "the problem" just being Netanyahu being obstinate. I wrote out two main points with many specifics to support and explain my meaning.

And the US knowingly funds the genocide in Gaza. It isn't an oopsie. They have only increased funding since Oct 7.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are not funding the genocide. They are funding the legitimate defense of Israel.

The Israeli leaders are mis-directing that funding into the genocide.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are not funding the genocide. They are funding the legitimate defense of Israel.

Oh they are most definitely funding the genocide. Here us one simple example: Boeing is the exclusive manufacturer of JDAMs, a system that retrofits bombs to make them missiles. The US provides direct funding to Israel for them to "buy" these systems. JDAMs are the most common bombs used in this genocide to target civilian infrastructure. Hospitals, schools, refugee csmos, bakeries, mosques, churches.

Plenty of other forms of funding and material support, this is just a particularly visceral example.

The Israeli leaders are mis-directing that funding into the genocide.

100% wrong, these are offensive weapons with only one purpose and they are provided with no strings attached. Funding and support has only increased and Israel has only escalated.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The purpose for which they are sold is "defend Israel", the purpose Bibi puts them to use as is "genocide", but that is not why we're selling them.

An example I use quite a bit is humanitarian aid, a lot of aid we send out gets stolen or re-directed by corrupt governments. That doesn't mean we're going to stop sending aid.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

"Defense" has a long history of euphemistic use and this is no exception. JDAMs have no defensive use. They are bombs. They have been and are used to bomb essential civilisn infrastructure in Gaza. The US and Israel still call it "defense". It is just a rhetorical trick. Same as " Israel has a right to defend itself", which is a thought-terminating cliche that provides a smokescreen for highly aggressive military actions with little care for civilians, journalists, aid workers.

Everyone in power knows how this works and what it means. It isn't an accident or even particularly unwanted. Israel has been invading and destroying Gaza for nearly a year. Nobody thinks a bunch of JDAMs are for defending Israel or are a case of misuse. They are being used exactly as intended.