this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
395 points (98.8% liked)

Games

16948 readers
686 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO
395
Peter Molyneux thinks generative AI is the future of games, all but guaranteeing that it won't be (www.rockpapershotgun.com)
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/games
104 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sugar_in_your_tea 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

they too, can then get more $$$ for less work.

I'm pretty sure it'll be less money for less work, at least after the first few titles. Companies really don't like paying more than they have to.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

One can dream.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

True, but if the VA (or their agent) has any sense of business they'll be making more per hour

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 1 points 3 months ago

And probably royalties for using their "likeness." But longer-term, I'm guessing total revenue for VAs will drop, and there will probably be less variety.