this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
436 points (98.2% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2537 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Gasping for air from a trench in eastern Ukraine, an infantryman was ready for the worst when a suffocating white smoke spread into his position.

A Russian drone had just dropped a gas grenade into the trench, an internationally banned practice in warfare used to suffocate Ukrainian soldiers hiding inside. Forced out in the open, the Ukrainians immediately became vulnerable targets for Russian drones and artillery.

. . .

Russia has increasingly deployed chemical agents in its grand offensive to occupy the last cities in the Donbas region under Ukrainian control. The suffocation tactic is to take out entrenched personnel and dampen the morale of Ukrainian soldiers who – severely outmanned and outgunned – have been withdrawing village by village in the east for nearly a year.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Everybody always gets hung up on the nukes but I never see anyone complaining about the firebombing which killed many times more people (or the Japanese and their many attempts at biological warfare).

War is inherently bad, and using powerful weapons to end it sooner is the pragmatic and often moral choice. Would you have preferred that the allies invaded Japan, causing millions more to die? Or perhaps simply blocade Japan, causing millions more to die? It's easy to be moralistic when you don't have to make decisions that have millions of lives hanging on them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, for sure let's continue to 1up and glorify violence. While you do that, let me reiterate the point you seem to be arguing against:

More violence is not the solution to violence.

You can go on now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

If you ignore the many examples throughout history of more violence being the solution to violence, perhaps you may have a point.

I can go on now?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The need for bombing with nukes is a made up history. Japan was surrendering with just one condition that wasn't a big deal and could be discussed in the peace treaty. But the bombs, specially the Nagasaki one, was not meant for the Japanese to surrender but as a show off to the USSR.

Because, believe it or not, [part of] the US saw the USSR as an enemy even during the war.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

There would never have been any peace treaty, the allies had already agreed that axis surrender must be unconditional.

Japan having one condition would not have matteted, because the allies were not interested in a conditional surrender.