this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024

576 points (99.1% liked)

Not The Onion

12390 readers

435 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

576

Kentucky State Fair removes ribbon-winning miniature after realizing it depicted a porn set (nypost.com)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

86 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Dude, you're literally embodying a Simpsons episode which already came true.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I want you to think deeply about if all porn is inherently artistic or if porn depictions have a separate circuimstance.

I made a comment earlier about how dressing a Naiad Statue up as a hooker changes the context of the artwork significantly.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You're being fucking weird, mate

LMAO

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Getting mad that some other guy's porn set miniature can't be left on public display is weird, mate.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Whatever you say, weirdo.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This isn't porn, it's a hand-crafted miniature. Which, yes, is art.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I read it. That doesn't make it not art.

Michelangelo's David is a depiction of a nude man.

Furthermore, Piss Christ, the controversial photo of a crucifix suspended inside urine is also art.

You are not the arbiter of what is art.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Listen, I view a lot of pornographic artwork pretty regularly. They are absolutely art, and very good art I would add. I wouldn't put them up on display at the state fair, personally, nor would I be angry if the person who did so had their works taken down by workers of the state.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Again, you are not the arbiter of what is art.

And you are saying some things about yourself that are quite hard to believe, like how your personal inbox was filling up with complaints over this.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nobody but you is discussing what is or is not art.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You above:

I want you to think deeply about if all porn is inherently artistic or if porn depictions have a separate circuimstance.

Me:

This isn’t porn, it’s a hand-crafted miniature. Which, yes, is art.

Then you pasted an image underlining how it is a depiction of a porn set, which surely implied that you were saying it isn't art.

So is it art or not?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Art or Not Art doesn't decide if it stays up in public.

Let's look at the instant replay.

I want you to think deeply about if all porn is inherently artistic or if porn depictions have a separate circumstance.

I want you to think deeply about if all porn is inherently artistic or if porn depictions have a separate circumstance.

Look at that. I didn't say it wasn't art. Wow.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Okay. No they don't. Because they are art.