this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
804 points (96.7% liked)

World News

38970 readers
2475 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/19046336

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What are the reasons those pointed-at reasons persist? Why does is that persistence more pronounced is some places, but not others? Can there be a symptom without underlying causes?

Read theory if you're actually curious and not just posting to post. Personally, I've come to think of inequality as being at the center of it all.

But the reason is certainly not "because <> is <>".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Read theory if you’re actually curious and not just posting to post. Personally, I’ve come to think of inequality as being at the center of it all.

Inequality doesn't just turn up out of nowhere.

But the reason is certainly not “because <> is <>”.

I never claimed "because country is country" is a deep and meaningful analysis of the material factors in a given country and its history. What it is, and what I expect people with a modicum of knowledge of the English language to understand it as, is vaguely gesturing at the overall situation and saying "this thing here that be the way it do". You know, pizza is tasty because it's pizza does one always have to be more specific than that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Inequality doesn’t just turn up out of nowhere.

Why would anyone post this? Of course it didn't just turn up out of nowhere.

What it is, and what I expect people with a modicum of knowledge of the English language to understand it as, is vaguely gesturing at the overall situation and saying “this thing here that be the way it do”.

That quoted phrase you have there is pure hot nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why would anyone post this? Of course it didn’t just turn up out of nowhere.

Good. Then you agree that it's valuable to look at the reasons for inequality, I presume, and not stop at "inequality is the centre of it all". Both material and immaterial ones. Or to put in classic Marxist terms (a bit reductive but it's close enough): What's the economic and cultural obstacles to class consciousness.

That quoted phrase you have there is pure hot nonsense.

It's using habitual/continuative aspect. "This thing here that is habitually that way because it habitually is that way".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I know you think you're the smartest person on Earth giving unthinking Americans lessons or something but you haven't taught me a damned thing here at all except what the German word for neoliberal is.

(But, I know, don't dare call them that!!! 😡🤬 😤)

😆

Separately, even frequent users of the habitual be wouldn't write a sentence like that.