this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
621 points (97.8% liked)

politics

18863 readers
3916 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

She did not touch on his claim that people who don’t have kids are more sociopathic.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gravitas_deficiency 250 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I wonder how she fits all the cognitive dissonance in her head?

Lady, he’s actively courting white supremacists and you are not white. Things are going to come to a head at some point for you in a very personal sense.

[–] [email protected] 171 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Lady, he’s actively courting white supremacists and you are not white.

She's pretty sure the leopards won't eat her face though.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago

She's probably right until the third or fourth year after the reich is installed.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If the leopards win my small hope will be that i get to see her, clarence t and their ilks faces after they outlive their use and are up against the wall next to the people they sold out

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And if her kids ever refer to themselves as Indian god forbid they ever mention their white background because according to Trump that's illegal.

So make sure the pick the proper race qt the beginning, like the half-elven in LOTR

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

I think I'd be concerned more about a return to the one drop mentality.

[–] eestileib 28 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What you need to understand is that India has a rigid caste system based on inheritance just like the US does; there was one already there in a lot of places and the britishers codified the hell out of it.

Many upper class Indian people don't see a conflict with white supremacy because they come from, and benefit from, the exact same system.

Somebody like Vivek Ramaswamy, for example. He looks like a dude with dark skin to a generic American. But that combination of names is a giveaway that he's a Tamil Brahmin; once you see his nose and forehead you have a pretty good guess of what his ancestral temple allegiance is; this all happens automatically for people from India (I am not but was married into a Tam-Bram family for 20 years and I picked it up myself).

I'm not saying that this is determinative of political stances; I know plenty of democratic voting upper crust Indians. But somebody like Usha Vance or Vivek Ramaswamy looks in the mirror and sees a Brahmin, which is the equivalent of me looking in the mirror and seeing a white person. They do not perceive themselves as a "minority".

[–] gravitas_deficiency 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh, I very much get that it’s probably related in some way to the caste system. I also think that the higher-caste/lighter-skinned Indians don’t really understand white supremacy if they think they’re gonna get a pass just because they’re wealthy and not quite as dark-skinned as other castes.

[–] eestileib 8 points 1 month ago

They did under the Raj, though, (still just barely) in living memory.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You’re right, that’s exactly how race supremacists see themselves relative to other people. However, these things are a fragile and temporary alliance till they deal with the “undesirables”. Funny thing, the status of “undesirable” is ever shifting. Many white people and white immigrants of Italian or Irish descent were considered “undesirable” in early U.S. history. There’s never any rational to race supremacy other than protecting the “in-group”, and that changes with the changing tides of power

Edit Vance is Scot-Irish, and sadly his people have this in their ancestral history https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Irish_sentiment

[–] eestileib 5 points 1 month ago

I'm not saying people like Ramaswamy understand how America works...

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

She checks the bank account and the dissonance is worth it to her

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

She does it by being just as awful if not worse than him