this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
308 points (92.3% liked)

Leftism

2110 readers
35 users here now

Our goal is to be the one stop shop for leftism here at lemmy.world! We welcome anyone with beliefs ranging from SocDemocracy to Anarchism to post, discuss, and interact with our community. We are a democratic community, and as such, welcome metaposts that seek to amend the rules through consensus. Post articles, videos, questions, analysis and more. As long as it's leftist, it's welcome here!

Rules:

Posting Expectations:

Sister Communities:

[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Solarpunk memes [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Imane Khelif is just the latest victim of idiotic transvestigators.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The answer is that dividing sports by someone's sex is stupid. It seemed like an easy answer, and like all easy answers, is a shitty answer.

[–] merc 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But, the solution to that -- not having any sex or gender based separation is that (with current Olympic sports) pretty much every event would be won by a man, and in almost every category women wouldn't even make the finals, so they wouldn't even show up on TV.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Just find another thing to differentiate on. Lung capacity. Muscle density. The things that actually matter.

Using sex just approximates those anyway.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Untrained anorexic division incoming

[–] merc 0 points 3 months ago

So... the "open" class would be all men, because they naturally have higher muscle density, and the "restricted" class would be half men because some men can meet that restricted standard?

Again, what's the point of having the women's events? I would have thought it was allowing women to win medals by not having to compete against men.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

If we didn't divide sports by sex, we would have had several sports where women could have not competed on the highest level. As an answer, it has worked well, and keeps working well for 99% of the cases.

We shouldn't throw away working solutions because they fail 1%. Unless of course you have a solution that works for a higher percentage without compromising the previously solved 99%.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Just find another thing to differentiate on. Lung capacity. Muscle density. The things that actually matter.

Using sex just approximates those anyway.