this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
97 points (90.8% liked)

politics

19246 readers
2577 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Did you hear the one about the couchsurfing dolphin...?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 42 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If anyone is still harboring doubts that bitcoin isn't a scam, look at who's pushing for it now.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (5 children)

I'm always confused about what this means, "bitcoin is a scam." It isn't. It does the thing it says it does. The fact that some bad actors use it for nefarious purposes doesn't mean the technology is lying, either

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago

Crypto does the thing it says it does: enable peer-to-peer transactions that require the advance permission of no third party or government. It really is digital cash.

The problem is that's the best medium for scams. No matter which crypto you transact in, there is always a point where the transaction becomes immutable, no backsies, no "reverse the charges", no "court order to confiscate funds". The money is gone, and can't be compelled to come back unless the scammer is compelled to send it back. And if the scammer is outside the reach if the victim's governmental law enforcement, the literally nothing can be done.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

The correct thing to say is “there are a majority of cryptocurrencies that are scams”. I think the problem is “Bitcoin” is being used like “kleenex”, as a catch all for blockchain or cryptocurrency. Bitcoin itself is not a scam.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

People who buy NFTs are getting what they pay for, too. We can debate whether they are paying way too much for bits, but people also pay too much for jewelery and yet there are lots of jewelery stores.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

I probably have one to sell you too.

I won’t charge you a penny more than I bought it for in 2021.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Yeah but if we're being real most people primarily consider bitcoin to be an investment and not a method for making discrete transactions.

So it's 90% a get-rich-quick pyramid scheme, 9% a method for making illegal transactions, 1% a method for people that are paranoid about the gub'ment to make transactions in a convoluted way to make it more difficult for the government to track transactions they didn't bother looking at anyway.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I've heard nation based currencies have also been used for scams. But yeah, BTC is the problem, let's all keep Janet Yellin in charge of our collective net worth. (/s) smh.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Janet Yellen is not in charge of the United States money supply. You’re thinking of the Federal Open Market Committee, which is comprised of the seven members of the Federal Reserve Board, the president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, and four of the eleven regional Federal Reserve Bank presidents on a yearly rotating basis.

And I’m not sure why you’re bringing up a criticism of our collective net worth on a discussion around whether Bitcoin is used in scams, unless you’re trying to push the narrative that traditional fiat currency is somehow worth less than an unbacked security. Which is both irrelevant to the conversation, and a pretty good indication that you don’t really understand how currency works.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Thanks for your input. You are correct. I'm pretty sure I don't understand how currency works. My point, which you ignore, is that all forms of of currency have been used in scams. Did you notice the (/s) at the end of the second sentence, which I used to indicate the snarky, and sarcastic nature of that sentence? Do you disagree, specifically that all forms of currency can, probably all have been, and all will continue to be used in scams?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sure, and I’ll even broaden that. I’m pretty sure everything that has ever been used as a medium of exchange has been used in a scam somewhere, and the easier it is to use that medium of exchange, the more scams have been perpetrated using it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago