this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
301 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2532 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It’s another example of how Trump and MAGA are attempting to undermine faith in the coming election. Trump lost the popular vote in both 2016 and 2020, so he might be making a preemptive strike at the legitimacy of the results should he lose the popular vote a third time. Still, it’s not clear why he’s telling his supporters not to vote at all. Perhaps it’s another example of the former president and convicted felon’s cognitive decline.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 63 points 4 months ago (4 children)

This man is genuinely retarded. If I didn't think his ego was as huge as it is, I'd think this is a tactic to save face when he gets crushed in November.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 months ago

I mean, he's incredibly unsubtle. Maybe he knows deep down that in a straight vote he's going to lose, so people voting isn't going to matter vs the amount of crime that's going to be committed in early November?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We call it developmentally disabled these days, bud.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

When we're talking about Trump it still seems appropriate somehow.

[–] andrew_bidlaw 19 points 4 months ago

As do other words, even if we make them up.

DEMENTALIZED

ENDOOFED

BABYHANDERED

DECOGNITIFIED

SQUAREPEGIFULLY INTOROUNDHOLIDIFIED

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They're struggling to come up with a plan... is he going to quit?

[–] ironhydroxide 3 points 4 months ago

I highly doubt it. One of the main reasons he wants the presidency is to pardon himself for everything and anything. And to be king.

Can't do either of those things if he quits completely.

[–] gravitas_deficiency 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps he and his brain trust are somehow thinking they should abandon democratic process and peaceful transition of power altogether and actually try to stage a literal coup. Watch what the legislative leadership does. Johnson in particular. He’ll probably try some sketchy bullshit on January 6, 2025.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I swear I read that certain states have put in laws where they can ultimately refuse the outcomes of elections if they so choose, and the SCOTUS is already primed to be the deciding factor. I don't recall if that was pure doom 'n gloom from his 2020 tantrums though

[–] gravitas_deficiency 1 points 4 months ago

Yeah, but the thing is, I really don’t think either Biden or Harris will take it lying down if the SC tries to straight up enable a coup. It would be categorically indefensible, even to Biden, who’s been frustratingly milquetoast in pushing back against their very obviously biased decisions of recent years.