this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
-2 points (33.3% liked)

/r/Sweden

182 readers
2 users here now

GÅ TILL FEDDIT.NU

Kommentarerna du skriver här skickas inte tillbaka till Reddit.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello, Protestant German here. I’m hearing a lot about the infamous Quran burnings in Sweden, and find it very strange. To me it’s fighting fire with fire, and as Muslims are very religious I can imagine it hurts them a lot.

Can someone help me understand how this makes sense?

Maybe I don’t have the full picture. Thank you!


Det här inlägget arkiverades automatiskt av Leddit-botten. Vill du diskutera tråden? Registrera dig på feddit.nu!

The original was posted on /r/sweden by /u/Haidenai at 2023-07-20 10:33:35+00:00.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

PrudentFood77 at 2023-07-20 10:42:24+00:00 ID: jspn9a0


it's a stupid silly thing to do... but how does it make sense to ban it? we have free speach, you are allowed to to stupid silly things

and in the long run; if the muslims realize they can ban things by "mostly peaceful protests" (tm) ... what will be the next thing they target to get banned? ...because it will not stop at banning burning the quran

will they perhaps target restaurant that are open during daytime under ramadan? will they target pride festivals? will they target same sex marriage?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Shear-buckle at 2023-07-20 12:12:59+00:00 ID: jspwa1k


It doesn't seem silly at all, it seems well justified considering the reactions to it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

miniatureconlangs at 2023-07-20 11:29:10+00:00 ID: jsprjqq


I don't see how 'free speech' is the same as 'permitting any action to express any opinion'.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

PrudentFood77 at 2023-07-20 11:33:46+00:00 ID: jsps0e2


"free speech" is just a non-legal term :) i think the correct wording should be "Freedom of expression"... but it's easier to write free speech

and not everything is allowed, from the goverments website: "For example, this freedom does not extend to slander or committing an act involving threats or agitation against a national or ethnic group. On the other hand, religions as such are not protected against expressions of opinion that challenge religious messages or that may be perceived as hurtful to believers."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

miniatureconlangs at 2023-07-20 11:43:36+00:00 ID: jspt1n6


Exactly; "free speech" isn't free speech. You can't, e.g. use a gun in arbitrary ways to advocate freer gun laws, etc. So e.g. restricting how you can use a Bible or a Quran wouldn't be particularly limiting - you can still express your dislike for the quran or the bible!

Restricting how you can say things is not the same as restricting what you can say.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

PrudentFood77 at 2023-07-20 12:01:01+00:00 ID: jspuxl5


true,

but also if we ban burnings of the Quran because muslims gets violent - we do it of the wrong reason... and that is a very dangerous path to take

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

miniatureconlangs at 2023-07-20 12:50:04+00:00 ID: jsq0q6n


I do sort of agree, but meanwhile, I do think a lot of free speech enthusiasts fail to grasp the difference between "åsiktsfrihet" and "rätt att göra saker utan konsekvenser".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Other-Ad-1851 at 2023-07-20 11:43:47+00:00 ID: jspt2b4


I dont think its a "silly thing" for the person having to flee his country after beeing tourtured (sharia).