this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
1238 points (94.2% liked)

memes

10668 readers
2760 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1238
Ghosted restaurants (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Capitalism doesn't qualify as free market activity then. Capitalism inherently involves treating persons as things. In the firm, the workers are jointly de facto responsible (DFR) for production, but the employer gets sole legal responsibility for the positive and negative results of production. This violates the principle of legal and de facto responsibility matching. DFR isn't de facto transferred, but legal responsibility is. Morally, this is an institutional fraud
@memes

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Capitalism inherently involves treating persons as things

In what sense, that other economic systems don’t?

This violates the principle of legal and de facto responsibility matching.

Not sure what such a principle would mean.

The different levels of involvement in an enterprise reflect the fact that each person is free to enter a variety of types of economic cooperation. When people get choice, diversity of behavior is the result.

What you’re seeing in different people having different levels of risk taking, responsibility, involvement, is evidence that those people entered the contract willingly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

It treats persons like things by not holding them responsible for the results of their actions.

That principle would mean that workers should jointly own the produced outputs and jointly owe the liabilities for the used-up inputs as in a worker cooperative.

An intuition pump for the tenet would be situations where the law doesn't fail to apply the principle. Consider an employer and employee committing a crime together.

Consent doesn't transfer responsibility.

@memes