Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
I support the ban. Stocks are not a firearm. They do not turn the weapon into a machine gun by definition. That’s why they were overturned. Congress would have to create a law to ban them. I agree with the scotus ruling.
I just wouldn’t have an issue if Congress banned them.
You support the ban but you support the SCOTUS ruling to overturn the ban that you support?
You sure are the agreeable type.
The ban referenced it as a machine gun. It’s not under the law. Therefore Congress has to create a law to ban. Just because I agree they should be banned doesn’t mean I’ll support illegally doing it.
Down voted for stating plain facts. Love this place.