this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
848 points (98.7% liked)

World News

39184 readers
1603 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The tech mogul’s platform is the first to get hit with charges under new EU social media law.

The European Union is calling Elon Musk to order over how he turned social media site X into a haven for disinformation and illegal content.

The EU Commission on Friday formally charged X for failing to respect EU social media law. The platform could face a sweeping multi-million euro fine in a pioneering case under the bloc's new Digital Services Act (DSA), a law to clamp down on toxic and illegal online content and algorithms

Musk's X has been in Brussels' crosshairs ever since the billionaire took over the company, formerly known as Twitter, in 2022. X has been accused of letting disinformation and illegal hate speech run wild, roll out misleading authentication features and blocking external researchers from tools to scrutinize how malicious content on the platforms spreads

The European Commission oversees X and two dozens of the world's largest online platforms including Facebook, YouTube and others. The EU executive's probe into Musk's firm opened in December 2023 and was the first formal investigation. Friday's charges are the first-ever under the DSA. 

Infringements of the DSA could lead to fines of up to 6 percent of a X’s global revenue.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Question still stands, is it enough?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

yeah it seems big enough that it might be cheaper to hire moderators

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Hire? There's enough nazis dying to get that job for free.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean that seems reasonably punishing yeah, not nearly the hours worth of profit usually charged to companies breaking the law. I believe the EU can even enforce its own content moderation on the site and charge the costs of that to Musk so its pointless for a company to not follow the laws at that point ...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Musk will buy a company and tank it for the memes. I don’t think a warning shot like this will sway his decisions on the direction of said company. The people making the decisions aren’t culpable, the company is. The people making the decisions will just leave to a different company and we can start the whole process over again.

I hope it’s enough and I sound like a bitter old man.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Then he can tank it for the memes. Do that to enough companies and the "weird genius techbro" mask starts slipping and the venture capitalists no longer want to bankroll you and you start being seen as a liability.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

God that would be great to see, what a temper tantrum that would be.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Historically, no, because companies still misbehave, the fines aren't high enough for them to not try and see whether they get away with stuff.

OTOH, historically, yes, because once fines come flying companies shape up.

That is, they're willing to gamble on that initial fine, but absolutely won't tank the recurring fines for continued infringement.