this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
650 points (93.8% liked)

tumblr

3366 readers
24 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't mean the current attempt is actually doing a good job at improving the situation, tho

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The current attempt is Latine. What's wrong with E? I thought everyone generally liked it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You still have to deal with the "el/los" and "la/las", because that depends on the word's gender. Should it be "el latine" or "la latine"? Invent le/les to comply? And when it comes to quantity, un latino, una latina, uns latinos, unas latinas, un(?) latine?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Proposal: either smoosh them together (eg: ella / loas) which preserves the historical gendering of the language while creating a non gendered article Or Create a separate non gendered article that can be used

Language is made up by and for the speakers of the language. Rules of grammar are not actually rules but just what the collective speakers generally agree upon.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Proposal: either smoosh them together (eg: ella / loas)

As neat as that'd be, ella ([ɛlə] not [ɛjə]) was already a word and got shortened to la.

As in ella agua, ella manzana, ella persona.

Not to say we can't repurpose things, but it was already a preexisting feminine word.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

The suggestions were just that. All it takes is speakers agreeing with a word for the use and to use it to the point where it becomes the standard.

No different than how gruntled has reentered the English language after being lost. It also changed meaning upon return so there's that similarity as well.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I dunno but those all sound like solvable problems and I think latine enbies will do great at solving them as long as latine binaries listen to them instead of calling the enbies anglos.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Any linguistic problem is technically solvable, just invent new words, add more rules and call it a day, you can do that for any language. Getting people that grew up and have used it for decades to accept is one hell of an uphill battle, especially as many will say the changes "are making up words to please half a dozen people"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That's why it's very important for all of us to be positive towards attempts to improve language.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

My fav response to that reasoning: all words are made up words. That's how languages work