this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
1183 points (99.4% liked)

World News

38506 readers
2722 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And what happens if Joe dies in his sleep before election day? No one is talking about this as a liability but given the speed of his cognitive decline and the stress of the job and schedule, why is it outside the realm of possibility? Trump will of course live to be 180 years old since he’s literally a conglomerate of McDonalds microplastics and literally one of the worst pieces of shit to walk the earth in the post modern era. Why would anyone want Trump over Kamala outside of being an impotent right wing Russia cuck?

Kamala sucks but she’s the contingency plan. She’s part of his admin that passed the IRA, CHIPS, etc. and trying to put forth executive action that would seemingly be beneficial for the American people. Presumably she’d continue many of the same policies as her predecessor. There is no perfect candidate in a FPTP two-party system.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

My point was less Kamala sucks, and more people probably want to vote for her even less than they do Joe Biden.

Its kind of telling when he talks about dropping out the first name everyone talks about is Sanders instead of Harris. Despite how unfortunately far fetched the idea is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Think the point is that there's no good option known and an overly short runway to build momentum, and the likely option would be Harris, and she's already the default option.

Instead of "Biden should step aside", the calls should be more specific in what they affirmatively do want.

Same with rhetoric about "just any third party", that's so vague that no one should want that, as third parties are very different and in opposition to each other.

So calls for 'not Biden' or 'just any third party' are utterly useless except for screwing up chances for a D win, without any particular actionable agenda being advocated for.