this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
96 points (85.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

9692 readers
756 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

My original question was "How do we disincentivize the purchase of pickup trucks/SUVs" but then I thought it would be better to approach the larger problem of car dependency and car ownership. One option is, of course, to create public transit infrastructure and improve it where it already exist. This, however, doesn't change the fact that some will still choose to drive. What would be the best ways to discourage people from owning personal cars?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

People are in engrained car habits. That's why alternatives to driving are important, but people are unlikely to switch unless we ALSO make driving less appealing

[–] Ookami38 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The solution seems to be, build those public transit options first. Let people get used to them, know they exist, etc. even if they're not massively used, their presence makes implementing some kind of penalty for driving WAY more likely to work - there's already an alternative in place, we don't have to worry about what we're gonna do now, were just gonna take the bus.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I totally understand why you say this. But at the same time:

  1. Be a politician

  2. Do the right thing and invest billions in an amazing public transport system knowing it won't be used properly until much later

  3. Lose your job for wasting billions on a system nobody uses. Ensure that every other politician in the world cannot henceforth invest in public transport because "Look what happened when that other guy tried it".

  4. There is no Step 4

[–] Ookami38 1 points 4 months ago

This is why I propose moving in sloooooow steps. One or two small changes at a time, and eventually we've "snuck" some stuff by and moved in the right direction.

The way I look at it, it's as likely to happen if we do it right as if we do it wrong. Either we're going to get rid of cars, or we're not. I'd rather make steps towards doing it right.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

address how this stance of yours isn't just a tax on poor people and how it isn't ableist.