this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
201 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4515 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’m not trying to convince you of anything. You always debate the same way.

As do you. When I've made a point you can't argue against, you start arguing why to vote for Biden, and when I say you're preaching to the choir, you call me selfish.

Biden still needs to convince voters to vote for him, and it doesn't matter that you think they should just be happy with what you're happy with.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Do you even remember the point of this discussion? I disagreed with another commenter on the reliability of the moderate Democratic vote, citing the sizable abstentions in the 2016 election by progressives. You blamed the candidate. We’re looking at the exact same situation this election. It’s too late for Biden to step down, and he against Trump again.

Are you really going to blame the candidate again now that America saw the direct impact of abstention in 2016 giving Trump the win? The repercussions of this election rests completely on the shoulders of voters.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You are pathologically incapable of imagining that voters are humans with agency.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And you seem to think voting is some personal commitment to a candidate and not the simple numbers game that politicians use to gain control.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Centrists are so fucking exhausting. Do any of you see voters as humans instead of demographics to be marketed to and exploited?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’m not a centrist. I’m an informed progressive who leverages my vote to get the closest elector to my ideals that is available. That absolutely results in “settling” to prevent another backslide in policy from a Republican win.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’m not a centrist.

if you say so.

I’m an informed progressive who leverages my vote to get the closest elector to my ideals that is available.

And yet you can't see that humans aren't numbers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I never said humans were numbers. That was your accusation.

I said elections were about numbers. Ask any political scientist.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I said elections were about numbers.

Numbers of what?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Strategic votes. Not people. If it were an actual representation of people, then Trump would never have been President, having lost the popular vote in 2016.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago

Strategic votes. Not people.

Yes, Numbers cast votes in your universe because numbers can be manipulated without putting in as much work.

If it were an actual representation of people, then Trump would never have been President, having lost the popular vote in 2016.

Clinton was such a shitty candidate that she didn't take the electoral college into account and didn't campaign to all those non-people you despise in the worthless flyover states. They were beneath her because numbers were gonna vote for her instead. Look at how that worked out.