684

The Supreme Court rules that state officials can engage in a little corruption, as a treat (www.vox.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Snyder v. US is the Republican justices’ latest decision weakening anti-corruption laws.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago

'That statute prohibits state officials from “corruptly” accepting “anything of value from any person, intending to be influenced or rewarded” for an official act.'

This is quite literally the 'textualists' ignoring the text of the law. Creatively redefining what 'rewarded' means. Jackson's dissent is basically 'Did you read the text?', 'Do you think Congress knows what words mean?', and 'Do you own a dictionary?'

It takes a lot of education to make a ruling this stupid. It should be impeachable.

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024

684 points (98.7% liked)

Not The Onion

11114 readers

540 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]