462
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Firefox on Debian stable is so old that websites yell at you to upgrade to a newer browser. And last time I tried installing Debian testing (or was it debian unstable?), the installer shat itself trying to make the bootloader. After I got it to boot, apt refused to work because of a missing symlink to busybox. Why on earth do they even need busybox if the base install already comes with full gnu coreutils? I remember Debian as the distro that Just Wroks(TM), when did it all go so wrong? Is anyone else here having similar issues, or am I doing something wrong?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

They can just use Flatpak as it will be the newest outside of Arch. Alternatively they could run Distrobox with something like Fedora.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I stopped using flatpak when I found out both I had to update outside of the package manager. Also using flatpak gave me some issues with my sound card, so I just run the .deb. To each their own though, which is why I love Linux.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian

Installing outside packages is generally not a good idea. You can use Distrobox with a upstream distro like Fedora or you can use Debian Back ports.

https://backports.debian.org/

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Had forgotten about backports. Need to get that set back up. Thank you for the reminder.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

It is fairly easy to use

this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
462 points (88.4% liked)

linuxmemes

19733 readers
1599 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS