this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
84 points (93.8% liked)

World News

38914 readers
2184 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

June 22 (Reuters) - Reuters denied on Saturday that it had reported that Israel would attack Lebanon within 48 hours, after reports circulated on social media citing the news agency as saying this.

"Any claims that Reuters reported that Israel will attack Lebanon within the next 48 hours are false. Reuters did not report this," a Reuters spokesperson said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Reuters – Bias and Credibility

Bias Rating: Least Biased


Factual Reporting: Very High


Country: United Kingdom


MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: Mostly Free


Media Type: News Agency


Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic


MBFC Credibility Rating: High Credibility

MediaBiasFactCheck.com: About + Methodology

Ad Fontes Media Rating: Middle / Reliable

Writing by: Tom Perry

Editing by: Frances Kerry

Archive Link: 23 Jun 2024 03:30:27 UTC

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Reuters and AP News are really the only two sources I pretty much implicitly trust anymore. As far as I'm concerned, the person reporting false news and attributing it to Reuters should be hung by the neck until dead.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

What's really frustrating is how many American news outlets are just taking AP and Reuters reports, and rehashing them with their own news readers.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's the routers business model though

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Oh I know, what I mean is when the major US outlets just say "A Reuters report says (XYZ)....and WE say that means ABCD!" like that is hardly good journalism, that's more along the lines of glorified op-eds.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Is there any way to get rss feeds directly from AP/Reuters any more?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I think Reuters only has a Best of feed from their agency side, which isn't really that useful as a news feed. All their feeds seem to be shut down, at least the ones I had stopped working.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Why would that be frustrating? That's explicitly what they're for. And we're better off for it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

The frustration is how AP and Reuters report the facts of what's going on, and then the other outlets take that and TELL you how to feel about it rather than do their own fact finding

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Jsyk in this specific context it's hanged. Weird right?

Like:

Hanged from the neck until death

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

I trust Reuters more than I trust Media Bias Fact Check. I of course still vary my media diet, but they're certainly a pillar of it.

Seem to remember that they had a big scandal with a climate change denier editor that changed some articles a few years ago. Good to remember that no oragnisation is above scrutiny.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

In this case, I don't think its credibility matters beyond whether or not they'd lie about not actually saying something people claimed they said.