this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
838 points (93.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

5153 readers
2271 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 71 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Musk is a pissbaby, but I'll whiteknight spacex until they blow up a tourist.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

They avoided this by just not performing contracted missions

https://www.space.com/spacex-starship-dearmoon-crew-reacts-private-mission-canceled

Probably for the better

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This wasn't a SpaceX decision though. The guy who contracted them is the one who cancelled the mission. Mostly because the rocket is not ready yet and he was sick of waiting.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The mission was contracted for 2023, which already passed. I know SpaceX didn't cancel it (why would they of they can just move the date into the future indefinitely) and that's why I said they didn't perform it. But the result is the same and the reaction of the client understandable. Any sane party will cancel a contract when they see that the other party is unable to fulfill their offer.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Surely the fault lies with the client who decided to sign a contract, fully understanding that it was all theoretical and based entirely on future projections, that may or may not be accurate.

It's not like he was lied to and thought that the ship already existed, or was only a couple of months away from completion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, when I miss the deadline, it's also not my decision to "cancel the project".

[–] JohnDClay 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They're still doing Polaris missions though right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I guess? The comment I replied to said "tourist" though and Polaris is with a professional crew.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh, that sucks. I hadn't heard about that cancellation. Still, SpaceX set an unreasonable timeline and expectations of the client, and that should have consequences.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

It's my main issue I have with the whole topic. Starting in 2017 or so, there were so many idiotic promises regarding space travel and all, this one included. Oh yeah and we'll colonize Mars btw. Like what are you people on? And now SpaceX is even behind on the contractual obligations to NASA, Artemis will not bring astronauts into moon's orbit this year. Now while do acknowledge that space travel is really hard, this was achieved almost 60 years ago already. What was promised does in no way match reality. Going to Mars was always unrealistic, but to me it feels like progress on ambitious yet achievable goals is worse than 60 years ago.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Blowing up rockets over protected swamplands and failing at things NASA learned decades ago isn’t enough for you?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Somehow Ive missed hearing about either of these

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

I first heard a full breakdown of the environmental regulatory aspects of SpaceX's operations in Tech Wont Save Us ep. 186 from September of last year. Definitely worth the listen (every episode of that show is worth the listen, in fact).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The launch site is bordered entirely by wildlife refuges and state parklands. The reason they blew up that rocket a while ago on 4/20 was because they didn’t want to get approval to dig a flame trench due to tight environmental restrictions in the area. Trenches that NASA realized were necessary over 50 years ago.

Here’s some articles if you don’t want to take my word for it:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/sep/05/texas-spacex-elon-musk-environment-wildlife

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flame_deflector

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Boca Chica test site in Texas is built immediately adjacent to a protected wildlife preserve. This is the site where SpaceX has been working on the Starship launch vehicle.

The second part about failing is extreme hyperbole. SpaceX is the most successful launch company in human history by any reasonable metric. I’d argue Musks distance from the company in recent years has helped.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago

That seems like a failure of the government to allow them to operate there.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Why whiteknight them at all?

Let them stand and and fall on their own merits

EDIT: lol @ the downvotes with no comments!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I promise I didn't downvote hahaha

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's fine it you downvote, but just tell me why you disagree with me on this topic.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Well I don't really simp for spacex, I'm just a fan of their rockets. I think they're really cool. I was just being dramatic :p