this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
134 points (95.3% liked)

Games

16798 readers
583 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I haven't tried Starfield because it's still getting patched, but Bethesda games are some of my favorites. Yes they're janky and everything but I love exploring and looting and they really nail that.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There are some films I enjoy which are objectively bad, and that's okay.

If people want to enjoy Bethesda games, it's fine, each to their own.

However, if you want to talk about game design, there is a lot of evidence which supports the claim that Bethesda don't know what makes a (objectively) good game anymore.

Unfortunately, Bethesda are the only ones in town who are capitalising on "Bethesda style games". (With the exception of a few, like The Outer Worlds, and Cyberpunk 2077).

Bethesda's strong suit is their physical world building - but everything else has been getting worse.

The running joke is that the players mod the game to fix after launch. Except it's not a joke, and it's really not funny when the devs actually expect the community to fix their game. They could simply pay someone to implement every single fix from the UFO4P and UESSP, but choose not to. They do not care about quality.

[–] Grandwolf319 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, Bethesda are the only ones in town who are capitalising on "Bethesda style games".

I thought a lot of games are like that now. I personally love the fallout universe but hate the game style. Hate now things like horizon zero, Witcher, Elden ring, assassins creed and all those games have slow pace open world with huge RPG elements.

More like Bethesda game style become an industry standard. That’s my perspective though, im sure those who like the format don’t agree.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Never play Starfield; it'll make you hate Bethesda, especially Emil Pagliarulo (the lead designer and writer of the story).

I used to feel the same way as you, until I played it. Now I have zero interest in anything Bethesda has coming out in the future. They've proven to me that they're incapable of making a modern game with a good story. Only thing that would convince me to play another title of theirs is if they finally ditch Gamebryo and never let Emil in the writer's room ever again, two things that'll never happen.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Pretty similar for me. I've been a fan of Bethesda since morrowwind but starfield was the last straw. It's a a slap in the face to fans

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

The faction quests were pretty good.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

They patched it, with paid mods

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I really like Starfield. It's not perfect, but it's great.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Sounds like a Bethesda game to me