this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
225 points (97.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5296 readers
444 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
225
Trump vows to ‘drill, baby, drill’ despite rally attendees wilting in extreme heat | Supporters hospitalized following rallies in Las Vegas and Phoenix, where temperatures have broken records (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'll note that heat stroke victims in Phoenix are more likely to survive this year than in the past due to ambulances stocking body bags full of ice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Way to go with the slippery slope fallacy huh, buddy. First of all - you shouldn't feel satisfaction when someone gets hurt. No matter if they are speeding, if they were overeating or if they smoked.

Let's also not call this "any emotion". This is "feeling satisfaction because of others surffering".

[–] Portosian 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So I took a browse through your comment history out of idle curiosity. You're an "um actually" concern troll that just looks for things to argue about. It's pretty obvious you don't actually care. Maybe you shouldn't feel satisfaction with being a contrarian assbag for entertainment.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Amazing, discrediting someone for being a "concern troll". Or maybe I don't like it when people get hurt and call out people who wish others harm. Because yaknow, I'm not a horrible person.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Comparing schadenfreude with wanting a genocide does not a good person make.

[–] spidermanchild 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Slippery slope would be the person comparing self-inflicted heat stroke whilst supporting a fascist climate denier to getting cancer. Let's make sure nobody ever has to face consequences for their actions ever again, what a noble fight! Thank you for making the world a better place.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

Facing the consequences of their actions, and a different person going "oh yes let them die en masse I feel so satisfied" is two entirely different things