this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
102 points (99.0% liked)

Space

8608 readers
23 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

๐Ÿ”ญ Science

๐Ÿš€ Engineering

๐ŸŒŒ Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Boeing and redundancy are like oil and water

[โ€“] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

To be fair, regarding redundancy:

The astronauts only need seven hours of "free-flight time" to perform the end-of-mission maneuvers and Starliner currently has enough helium for 70 hours of free-flight time, Boeing said.

[โ€“] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Boeing said

Do we really trust them at this point? I mean, if true that's great, but they've lied before.

[โ€“] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

From a business point of view, I don't think lying about this is in their best interest. If they lie to the FAA about their passenger planes, maybe they get an investigation and a fine. If they lie to NASA about the safety of Starliner, they lose their only customer for it.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Trust? No.

Hoping their greed results in safe conclusion to the mission.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

If they succeed, it'll be in spite of their greed, not because of it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)