But as I said - "either way" so my earlier reply still stands, and your actual reasoning is in fact even more gross than if it was an attempt at a not all men (it's paternalistic, condescending, even authoritative, and ableist too - other people's health is none of your business nor is what substances someone might use to ease their pain, and you, or any other individual for that matter definitely shouldn't have any say in what others consume or how they enjoy themselves as long as they aren't harming others. And no, you considering others a "burden" on the health system isn't actually harming you, that's just more ableism with a pinch of eugenics on your part).

E: Giving you the benefit of the doubt I assume you're pro choice which really makes me wonder how you settle that "my body my choice" stance with this nonsense.. (I don't actually care, that's just for you to try to explain to yourself)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

I'm not seriously suggesting that we ban all those things. That is impossible.

It's just my wish since they are so harmful.

Either way your response shows that it's not worth discussing anything with you.