this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
136 points (97.2% liked)

Stargate

1436 readers
2 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This is the one. SG-1 was by far the best series, so I’m fine with doing it again from the perspective of a different team. Aside from basic mechanics, it really doesn’t have to have anything in common with SG-1 - the galaxy is big and there are many possible gate combinations. However the key was following a team that just seemed perfect together

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

If its 1/2 as good as star trek lower decks, im 100% in

[–] captain_aggravated 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Side question: SG-2 was Kawalski's command in the pilot episode, and then I don't recall ever hearing that number used again. Did they retire the number from the sport?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They definitely kept it in rotation, as I remember SG-2 was with them on Kheb

[–] captain_aggravated 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Which one was Kheb?

Edit: and don't come back wtih "P9X-434" or whatever. Man I used to watch that show enough to where I used to know some of the planets by those codes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The planet where they first find the Harcesis baby, with the monk and Oma Desala

[–] captain_aggravated 1 points 4 months ago

oh with the monk that speaks in ice cream koans. right.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Almost certain SG-2 came up again afterwards but I couldn't tell you who led it off the top of my head.

[–] mindbleach 1 points 5 months ago

My pitch is SG-100. Set it a century into the future, as pointedly low-fantasy sci-fi, like very little is going to change for day-to-day life. A techno-pessimistic sort of humanism as a counterpoint to Star Trek's grand visions. Yeah, fifty years of public knowledge about the gates unites humanity in the sense that you can walk to alien planets, but we're still a bunch of factionalist dinguses, on Earth and elsewhere.

The years following the series we got are full of "bicycle diplomacy," where we hand out everything that's cheap and common for us but weird and rare for foreign planets. We'd also be pretty free with weedkiller and pesticide, so invasive species we accidentally carry over can be dealt with swiftly. Domestic cats are back to being classic villain props, because they're not allowed offworld unless spayed or neutered, so they're obscenely expensive. Dogs are omnipresent.

We invent proper AI, but it's nearly incapable of opinion, and every artificial person is more of a character being played. Still an intellect! Still capable of explaining why and how it reached a conclusion from observation and reason. It just is not wired like any living creature. Basically: a refutation of Chinese Room nonsense, but also a bizarre angle on general intelligence.

The real fun for this series would be skipping "back in time" about fifty years in the future. It's always going to be dramatic irony, where major series arcs are established as minor problems that should blow over in a couple months. It's also an excuse to bring back actors from SG-1 and Atlantis - all in old-fart makeup, except for Christopher Judge, who is eternal.