this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
120 points (95.5% liked)

politics

20414 readers
3030 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ben Carson's remarks about whether he would accept the results of the 2024 presidential election regardless of which party wins falls in line with a recent Republican trend that's causing a stir among social media users.

On CNN's Laura Coates Live on Thursday night, Coates asked Carson, the former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development: "Will you accept the results of the 2024 election, regardless of who wins, yes or no?"

Carson replied: "I will accept the results if it's done in a fair and transparent way."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Why does no one ever ask for specifics? What is fair? What is transparent? Don't let them leave these answers vague where literally anything can strike them as unfair. Should every vote be counted? Does anyone remember when they simultaneously demanded the count be stopped in one place and continued in others? Force them to look ridiculous. Of course they will just wind up saying and doing whatever in the end, but put it next to a quote so their buffoonery is on full display. Jesus christ, where are the real journalists?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Why does no one ever ask for specifics?

The con that Convicted Sex Offender Treason Trump is running depends on never talking about specifics. That applies to everything, not just his Start the Steal conspiracy. Every politician besides himself is "corrupt" or "crooked". No specific details ever given. Even though Bernie Sanders correctly says Trump himself was the most corrupt president in American history. The election was "stolen". No specific details ever given that have not been completely debunked in courts.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Hence my cry for better journalists. They do nothing except hit record and ask the most insipid questions and let these morons prattle on and then play it for an audience and call it news. It's fucking useless. We might as well get all our news from fucking TikTok.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

This leans right into Americans' short attention spans and inability to understand nuance or complicated subjects.

I mean large swaths of the country chirp "America is the best" or "America is #1" without ever even taking a second to ask what it is we're even "the best" at.