this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
121 points (90.1% liked)

Games

16848 readers
980 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 55 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Stares at most PDX games having increasing player counts

How much of this is the lack of people wanting to play strategy games vs the lack of good strategy games

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

exactly what i was going to ask. Uh, when was the last good strategy game? Looking at my steam library...

I have 2000+ hours in factory games, Factorio, Satisfactory, Dyson Sphere... not really strategy but those are solid thought based games released <10 years ago

Then.... Age of Empires 4? Civ 6? Both pale in comparison to their predecessors. Cities Skylines 1... but then there's the whole thing about 2. Star Trek Infinite was a flop and from what I read was just a horrible bland game. Serious, what has come out by big studios in the last 5 years in terms of strategy? I see more flashy graphics than strategy in these recent games.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Victoria 3 is the only one I can think of, but the reception is lack luster. Maybe I'll pick it up I'm 5 DLCs

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

I really like Victoria 3, it has its issues but I don't mind them that much. I find much of the criticism is from ppl. who played Victoria 2.

In terms of other new games there is humankind which is similar to the Civ series. It has some great new concepts but some weirdness that I for unknown reasons can't move past.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Yeah I quite enjoy vicky 3, my main issue with it is that there always seem every play through seems to have a bug pop up and break the immersion

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

thanks for the tip, i'll look into this

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Exactly! I absolutely love EU4 and am excited about the likely next installment. Unfortunately, I'm less excited about their other recent launches, because the depth of strategy just isn't quite there.

But then I look around and can't really find a comparable game. There's Total War, but y strategy there is pretty weak and more about battlefield tactics than actual grand strategy. Civ exists, but it's in a pretty different category (and not really my thing; I do like Civ IV though). I own a lot of strategy games, but most are kind of shallow. I love complex games with a lot of moving parts, which yields a lot of variation game to game, and that just isn't all that common outside of PDX games.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I cant get past eu4 mid game. I get early wins, can't keep up in much, get swarmed by 30k artillery groups and 100+ fleets.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

For armies:

  1. Fill combat width, esp the front line, and ideally the back line (back line is essential in end game)
  2. Keep up on tech, including your mercs - need to rehire every few decades
  3. Choose good battles - terrain matters (e.g. don't attack into the mountains), stack size matters; retreat if you're caught in a bad battle
  4. Get some buffs - morale is most important early game, discipline and combat ability starts to matter more by mid game; you should focus on one or two areas to specialize (so idea groups and policies should synergize with national ideas)
  5. Have good leaders - should have high army tradition, so your leaders should all be 2-3 star generals

Usually by mid game, I'm steamrolling everyone and am the biggest great power, even if I started small. Consider watching some streamers/YouTubers, many do a good job explaining things as they go.

For navies:

  1. Watch battles and retreat if you start seeing red on your side - naval battles have a domino effect, so if you're seeing more red on their side, consider continuing, you might capture more than you lose
  2. Morale is the most important factor here - if you're outnumbered, check individual ships and leave the low morale and damaged ships in port
  3. If you're filling combat width, the easy strategy is to get a bunch of heavies - don't worry about the inland sea malace (heavies are fine in inland sea, galleys suck in deep water), if you can out-gun them, you'll probably win
  4. Pick your naval doctrine carefully - if you get galley combat ability, consider going all galleys and go over force limit as needed - it's cheaper to be over force limit with galleys than at force limit with heavies
  5. Naval leaders don't matter all that much, they can break a tie, but that's about it; individual ship morale is king in navies
  6. It takes a long time for AI to repair boats, so popping in and out of port can be a great way to whittle down their navy and eventually win - make sure to retreat as needed to not lose boats
  7. If you have naval dominance, destroy their navy entirely (occupy provinces with their boats, engage, repeat until it's dead)
  8. Don't fight with light ships, they're a liability (see 2, they get morale hammered); transport ships are really hardy, so use them as a bullet sponge if you need to fill combat width

Enemy fleet size doesn't matter at all. You can defeat 100+ ship fleets if you can beat the ships that engage (like 20-30), you just need to get it to start to domino. So commit to either galleys (with galley combat naval doctrine) or heavies, and if you start to lose, retreat, repair, and reengage.

By the mid game, it's easy to absolutely dominate if you play the early game well. Your goal in the early game is to build a power base, which means:

  • expand your borders a bit by taking good land - centers of trade, defendable mountain passes, etc
  • reduce autonomy
  • get good synergies in your idea groups
  • border the countries you want to engage in the middle game
  • build the right buildings

So by mid game, you should be a regional, if not global, power, and your time will be spent gobbling up land and converting wrong religion land. I usually stop playing about 1650-1700 because I've usually already accomplished my goals. Late game, the game should be pretty easy, except the 2-3 big powers you've neglected all game.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Do you have anything recommended?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 1 points 6 months ago

Yeah, pick a big nation, ally another big nation, and only fight battles you know you can win. If you and your ally are big enough, you shouldn't get attacked.

It's a complex game, so consider lowering the difficulty if you're having trouble as a big nation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Just play as Sweden to get the hang of things 🤷‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Tried Sweden, England, France, Spain, ottomans and one Indian one - still that mid game issue