this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
301 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

57432 readers
4335 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
301
DeviantArt’s Downfall Is Devastating, Depressing, and Dumb (slate.com)
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
83 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hellothere 44 points 3 months ago (4 children)

It's almost like low quality mechanisation is something that should be resisted. I wonder where I've heard that before...

[–] the_crotch 37 points 3 months ago (3 children)

You heard it from traditional artists when the camera was invented

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago

And photographers when Photoshop was invented

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And birthed impressionism as a result. These are tools, artists will adapt.

[–] the_crotch -4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

And if they can't compete with the soulless generic crap that ai spits out, they probably shouldn't be artists

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Everyone should be an artist. It doesn't have to be professionally but everyone should be creating something.

[–] the_crotch 3 points 3 months ago

If they're not doing it for a living they don't have to compete with anyone, least of all AI

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

It's less of an issue with competing via comparisons of two, more an issue with never being seen in the first place as real works become grains of sand on beaches of generated content.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Every gallery in the world did not rush out to exhibit every submitted photograph with no curation or quality filter when photography was invented

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

A physical gallery has limited wall space. A website does not. Ai art should just be tagged as such, so it can be filtered

[–] the_crotch 5 points 3 months ago

If youre implying that every gallery in the world is rushing to exhibit every submitted ai picture with no curation or quality filter, name 5.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)

As the photographic industry was the refuge of every would-be painter, every painter too ill-endowed or too lazy to complete his studies, this universal infatuation bore not only the mark of a blindness, an imbecility, but had also the air of a vengeance. I do not believe, or at least I do not wish to believe, in the absolute success of such a brutish conspiracy, in which, as in all others, one finds both fools and knaves; but I am convinced that the ill-applied developments of photography, like all other purely material developments of progress, have contrib­uted much to the impoverishment of the French artistic genius, which is already so scarce. It is nonetheless obvious that this industry, by invading the territories of art, has become art’s most mor­tal enemy, and that the confusion of their several func­tions prevents any of them from being properly fulfilled.

― Charles Baudelaire, On Photography, from The Salon of 1859

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

have contrib­uted much to the impoverishment of the French artistic genius, which is already so scarce.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago

TBF he was kind of right, if you look at the industry of wall art these days then 98% of whats on people's walls is printed imagery and copies. Imagine if we paid a real artist directly for every one of those framed and hung works instead of giving profit to some soulless corporation to make monotony incarnate.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

yOuRe GaTeKePiNg!!!

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 months ago

I don't know for what product that'd be desirable. What did you have in mind?