this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
193 points (88.4% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4572 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

All it takes is one Supreme Court nomination during Trump’s term and we’re fucked for that much longer. There’s a good chance Thomas dies in the next 4 years, do we really want 40 more years of some young right wing radical in that seat?

I think that’s what young people really don’t get. It’s not just 4 bad years (although even that argument is a pretty privileged thing to say).

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago

Thomas won't even have to die. If Trump wins you can be sure we'll see at least 1 resignation and replacement. They aren't going to make the same mistake that RBG made, especially since they've had their eye on the ball when it comes to packing the courts with conservative judges at every level for decades.

Everything is in place for Trump to perform an autocratic authoritarian takeover of America. People need to be mentally prepared to fight or flight.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

He repealed 112 environmental regulations in one term and wrote a record 220 Executive Orders, without any familiarity with the job of holding office, and during a pandemic. Imagine how much more effective he’ll be at destroying our progress this time around.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

A lot of people can’t understand 10 years in the future. Our animal inside wants now now now. Gotta store up for winter.

The problem with the Democrats is they are poorly selling the future, while the Republicans are “promising” the now, at the expense of the future.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

This ^

Alito and Thomas are the two oldest on the court at 74 and 75 respectively. So there's a good chance that whoever is elected in '24 gets a shot at replacing one or both of them.

DEFINITELY whoever is elected in '28.

So, for safety's sake, we need a D win in BOTH '24 AND '28.

Replacing them flips the court from 6-3 Conservative to 5-4 Liberal.

BUT - then the next two oldest are Roberts, who would be the swing vote, and Sotomayor. Both 69 currently.

So in '28, they'll be the same age as Alito and Thomas now. Likely to be replaced in either the '28 or '32 cycle.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Have we replaced all 3 of the democrats with younger ones so we don’t have another fucking nightmare from someone’s pride about their job?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I can’t tell if that’s a joke but yes? They’re all relatively young for justices. None in their 70s. Granted, Trump pushed the envelope in terms of age for justices

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

it goes further, a lot of them don't trust the court anymore at all. to them it's beyond redemption so it doesn't matter who gets appointed by whom.