Ukraine

8285 readers

594 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW

Server Rules

Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
No racism or other discrimination
No Nazis, QAnon or similar
No porn
No ads or spam
No content against Finnish law

Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

doo

[email protected]

Biden Administration Announces Additional Security Assistance for Ukraine (www.defense.gov)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Equipment to integrate Western launchers, missiles, and radars with Ukraine's systems;

Additional High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems(HIMARS) and ammunition

155mm and 105mm artillery rounds

Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicles

M113 Armored Personnel Carriers

Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles

Trailers to transport heavy equipment

Tube-Launched, Optically-Tracked, Wire-Guided (TOW) missiles

Javelin and AT-4 anti-armor systems

Precision aerial munitions

High-speed Anti-radiation missiles (HARMs)

Small arms and additional rounds of small arms ammunition and grenades

Demolitions munitions and equipment for obstacle clearing

Coastal and riverine patrol boats

Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear protective equipment;

Spare parts, training munitions, maintenance, and other ancillary equipment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tellah 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The one thing I kinda thought the boomers who predominantly run shit would be good at was to remember what level of economic commitment is required to win a real, serious military conflict (and Afghanistan and Iraq don’t count - they were fully asymmetric conflicts). But it seems they can’t even do that.

Well Afghanistan and Iraq are really the only two wars which the boomers can be said to have “fought” in the sense of being the largest voting bloc, well represented in the administration - basically running things.

They were post-WW2 children so they weren’t really running things during Korea and Vietnam, or the Cold War generally. The two conflicts you mentioned are just about the two best examples of “Boomers’ Wars” you can find, so to say “they don’t count” is funny because it should at least illustrate why the current situation is not so surprising. They don’t know how to fight a war - they were born when their parents just won a fucking big one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Not to be all: "well ackshually", but actually, my dad is the definition of a baby boom kid - born shortly after WW2, (the baby boom) and served in the navy during Vietnam.

It might be more fair to say: "They don't know how to win a war"

[–] gravitas_deficiency 2 points 6 months ago

Hah, yeah, you have a point. I was thinking of “participated in, and generally socially aware of”, but in terms of leadership experience you’re spot on.