this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
640 points (98.8% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4627 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump also assured Daniels that he and Melania didn't “even sleep in the same room," she testified

After meeting the future president of the United States at a golf tournament in 2006, adult film star Stormy Daniels testified Tuesday that Donald Trump's personal bodyguard asked if she would like to have dinner with the once-and-future Republican nominee.

"No, with an expletive in front," Daniels said she told the aide in response, per NBC News. But she reconsidered after meeting with her publicist, she said, recalling their words: "If nothing else, you'll get a great story" and "what's the worst that could happen?"

But, according to Daniels, dinner never happened. When she got to Trump's hotel room, she found him in pajamas -- he later changed -- and eager to discuss her work in the adult film industry, where she had risen from performer to director, and whether she had ever contracted and STD ("I've never tested positive for anything," Daniels said).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I don't like to judge other people's actions but after all of the warning signs:

"Have you had an STD?" Spanking with the magazine after she insults him "You look like my daughter"

Why did she sleep with him? I hope she got paid. If it was just on the advice of her publicist I hope she fucking fired them.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Well . . . yeah, she got paid. That's what the trial is about.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

She got paid to keep quiet about it much later.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I thought the trial is about her getting paid not to talk about sleeping with him, not if she got paid to sleep with him.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

Technically it’s about how she was paid, not about the keeping quiet.

It’s legal to pay someone to do something and pay them to not talk about it. NDAs are already a thing. You’re just not allowed to pay for it with campaign funds, it’s expected to come out of your own pocket

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Now you're just splitting hairs. She received 6 figures..and 3 inches

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No, it was one time consisting of two pumps.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

There's a tradeoff between precision and conciseness. Outside of a mathemadickal context, it doesn't really matter whether it's 2.72 or 3.14 inches.

Obligatory XKCD about coordinate precision

Hotlink

(You probably knew this, I just wanted to tack on a joke)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago
[–] eestileib 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

She did get paid, that's what the whole trial is about.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Actually, no, it's not. It's not illegal to pay someone to keep quiet. It is illegal to use campaign funds and lie about where that money is going. That's what this trial is about.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He said he'd get her on the apprentice, but seems he lied about that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

No way. He lied, just to get what he wanted short term? 🙄