this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
1048 points (91.7% liked)

Political Memes

5223 readers
3385 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There is no course of action which is productive to our interests.

As an aside, hypothetically, if you had a choice between:

  1. Shipping weapons to Israel
  2. Biden wins the 2024 election

Which would you choose? You can only pick one and there is no third option in this purely hypothetical situation.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There is no course of action which is productive to our interests.

If you honestly believe this, then the only rational move is to use your vote strategically to increase the chances of the viable candidate - who most closely aligns with your belief - getting elected. Effectively throwing your vote away on an unviable candidate increases the chances of the candidate less like you will win.

Play the game you're playing, not the one you wish you were.

And to answer your question, definitely 2. Although I believe i'm missing something.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Play the game you’re playing, not the one you wish you were.

I am. I hope to demonstrate the Democrat party is non-viable when it refuses to make material compromises with leftists and progressives.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You admit it's not a way forward, but then argue as if it is. I don't follow.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's a hail mary that will likely fail.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Maybe 3rd party but probably just a write in.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Chances are way higher that you get someone through the primaries on a major ticket and they win the election. Probably nearly infinitely so.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Chances are way higher that you get someone through the primaries on a major ticket and they win the election

What are you basing this on?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You said earlier that even if progressives got someone through on the dem ticket, that they would still lose the general election because liberals would vote republican.

And you need it explained why writing someone in has even less of a shot?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

You need to re-read my goal of writing someone in. Yes, getting someone decent through the primaries and hoping liberals support them in the general has less of a shot than demonstrating the Democrat party is non-viable in it's current state by writing in or voting 3rd party.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What's the ultimate goal of showing the Democrat party is non-viable?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Getting liberals and moderates to move out from the center.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

To eliminate "nothing will fundamentally change" as a choice at the polls and force them to choose significantly rightward or significantly leftward candidates.