this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
228 points (92.9% liked)

World News

38968 readers
2506 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

All coal from the Earth has a radioactive component to it. Burning coal releases more radiation into the atmosphere than a properly functioning nuclear reactor ever does. Fly ash from coal fired power plants contains 100 times more radiation than nuclear power plants emit.

The idiots on here apparently also think that burning coal somehow doesn’t create waste that will last for longer than humanity has existed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nobody brings up coal but nuclear stans and bots. You definitely put your favorite straw man to work.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Germany could have eliminated coal a decade or more ago. That's an important point to bring up.

I agree it's too late now for nuclear to make sense, but that was a lost decade of coal emissions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It would be of the discussion was nuclear vs coal - which it isn’t.

You’re bringing up the straw man because you want turn away the discussion from renewables.

There’s good discussion to be had on the (complex) situation in Germany but it’s immediately flooded by the nuke-bots.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The discussion may not have been nuclear vs coal, but the reality was. That's the whole problem.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

2 x No it isn’t. I know you love your precious precious nuclear to death and back and you really really need to discuss coal to better shill for it. Nobody cares about your religion and your straw man.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"Nuh uh!"

Okay whatever lol. Deny reality all you want. More nuclear = less coal, it's very simple math. Anyone not blinded by "scary nuclear!" can see it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Nuclear just means massive ~~potential~~ radioactive pollution as there is no secure storage for the radioactive waste. You are now going to claim there is proven safe storage, there just a couple of mishaps really.

Also, more importantly, there isn't even enough fission material to sustain demand for significant time if Germany and others were to switch. But sure lets's just skip and ignore renewables. Renewables pollute so much.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You know what word I didn't see at all in your response? Coal. Funny about that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Bummer, your straw man didn’t work.