this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
1540 points (92.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

5903 readers
3897 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago (4 children)

No one is being forced.

For fuck's sake.

Peterson just lied about the bill.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/qbnamx/no-the-trans-rights-bill-doesnt-criminalize-free-speech

No one is stopping him or anyone else from being a bigoted asshole. Asking people to stop doing it and telling them why is not forcing them.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ok. Thanks for the clarification.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sorry I got mad, I'm just so angry that people believe that lie because it's turned into so much hate against trans people.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Thanks for the apology. I really hate the LGBT hate. I don’t understand what’s wrong with letting people live their own lives the way they want, if they aren’t physically affecting others. Shame my original post got downvoted so much. I didn’t think it was offensive.

Edit: also thank you for correcting my misconception over the law! I’ll make sure to correct people going forward.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Wow this sounds really reasonable, wtf kinda drugs is Peterson on if he thinks it restricts free speech...

TLDR: bill C-16 adds gender identity and expression to the list of discrimination protections, a list which already includes gender, ethnicity, religion and sexual orientation. So yeah right now you can't fire someone for being black, under C-16 this will also apply to trans people. Ontario already has this in their provincial laws, so Peterson is already living under such a "regime".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Wow this sounds really reasonable, wtf kinda drugs is Peterson on if he thinks it restricts free speech…

If I recall, Peterson's entire idea on that was that it would result in misgendering being considered hate speech, though it's been a while so I might be misremembering.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No one is being forced

I think you misunderstood his hyperbole as a literal thing

Of course people aren't putting a gun to your head. But there are often consequences for not doing it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Such as what? Can you demonstrate someone suffering any legitimate consequences?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I have personally seen many instances of people getting banned or suspended from communities for either misgendering people (intentionally or not), or refusing to use their preferred pronouns.

But due to a real concern of retaliation or getting banned here myself, I will not be providing specific examples.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sorry... that's what you're talking about? People being banned on internet forums? Big fucking deal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There are also real world instances of violence over the same things if you do a quick web search.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Sorry, it's not my job to prove your claims. If there are real world instances of violence, I'm sure you can provide them and show they were definitely unprovoked.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You sound pretty ignorant. Intentionally misgendering someone at work would get you canned pretty fast at most corporate jobs.

There's no reason to reason not to just refer to people their gender identity but you are either lying or very unaware of corporate culture.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

You mean harassing someone at work will get you fired. That's true no matter what type of harassment it is. That has nothing to do with pronouns. You could get fired for repeatedly calling someone at work a panda.